First, name the problem you actually have
"Reputation management" gets sold as one thing, but contractors walk in with four different problems, and the right company depends on which one is yours. Get honest about it before you compare anyone, because a shop built for one is often weak at the others.
Problem one: you rank fine but you are losing the click. Your map pin shows up, then the homeowner sees you at 12 reviews and 4.4 next to a competitor at 300 reviews and a 4.9, and they call the other guy. That is a review-volume and star-rating problem, and it is the most common one. Problem two: you just got a one-star, maybe unfair, maybe a mix-up with another customer, and you do not know whether to respond, ignore it, or try to get it removed. That is a response-and-recovery problem. Problem three: you have no idea what is being said about you because reviews land on Google, Facebook, Yelp, Angi, and the BBB, and nobody is watching all of them. That is a monitoring problem. Problem four: you have good reviews but they are invisible to Google's ranking and to the AI answers, because your rating is not marked up in a way a machine can read. That is a schema problem.
Most contractors have some of all four, but one is bleeding the most jobs. Name it in a sentence: "I rank but lose the click on low review count," or "I got a bad review and need to respond right," or "I have no idea what's being said where." A good reputation company handles all four as one system, but the way they talk about your specific sentence on the first call tells you whether they heard you or are running a pitch. If they answer a different problem than the one you named, that is your first data point.
The one question that separates the pros from the trouble: how do you get reviews?
This is the whole ballgame, and it is where the bad actors expose themselves fastest. Ask any reputation shop, in plain words: how, exactly, do you get a customer to leave a review? Then listen for which of three answers you get.
The good answer: they build a simple system that asks every satisfied customer at the right moment. A text with a direct link right after the job closes, while the fresh install or repair is still on the homeowner's mind. A follow-up if they do not respond. A card, a QR code, a line in the invoice email. The reviews come from real jobs, they go to real platforms, and the timing is what does the heavy lifting. Nothing clever, just discipline, done for every customer instead of the one or two a busy owner remembers to ask.
The bad answer that sounds good: "we filter your reviews first." This is review gating, and it is the trap. The shop sends every customer to a survey that asks "how did we do" first, then routes only the happy ones to Google and diverts the unhappy ones to a private inbox. It feels smart. It is against Google's policies and, since the FTC's rule took effect, it can draw real penalties for suppressing honest reviews. Google catches gating patterns and can wipe the reviews you paid to collect, or worse. If a shop pitches gating as a feature, walk. They are selling you a fine dressed up as a service.
The answer that is outright fraud: buying reviews, or writing them in-house from fake accounts. Google's systems and the platforms' filters are built to detect exactly this, and a purge of fake reviews can crater a rating overnight and flag the profile. It is also flatly illegal to post fake reviews. Any shop that hints at "we can get you 50 five-stars fast" is handing you a liability. The honest version is slower and it is real: you earn reviews from the jobs you already do well, and the volume builds because you are finally asking everyone instead of no one.
The scorecard: run every shop through the same nine checks
Stop comparing reputation companies on vibes and screenshots of five-star widgets. Score them. Put every shop through the same nine checks and total it up. The one that lands on the best-fit side for your situation is your best, no matter who ran the smoothest sales call.
| Check | Best-fit answer | Walk-away answer |
|---|---|---|
| How reviews are earned | Real asks to real customers, right after the job | Gating, filtering, or "we can buy you reviews" |
| Account ownership | Your Google Business Profile stays in your name | They own the login and hand it back if you leave |
| Platform coverage | Monitors Google, Facebook, Yelp, Angi, BBB | Google only, ignores where your trade gets hit |
| Response drafting | Sounds like you, run past you before posting | Copy-paste "we value your feedback" on every one |
| Trade fluency | Knows your trade's review patterns and disputes | Same template it runs on dentists and lawyers |
| Bad-review handling | Honest on what can and cannot be removed | "We guarantee we'll delete any bad review" |
| Schema markup | Marks up your rating so Google and AI read it | Never mentions it, or does not know the term |
| Reporting | Ties to review count, star trend, map-pack rank | Vanity dashboard, no line to booked jobs |
| Exit terms | You keep the profile, the reviews, the system | Reviews and access walk out with them |
Use it live on the call. You do not need a perfect score, but the pattern tells you everything. A shop on the best-fit side of six or seven checks is worth a second conversation. A shop on the walk-away side of three or more is selling you risk. The single most important row is how reviews are earned, because that one row decides whether you are building an asset or a liability. A close second is account ownership: if the Google Business Profile is not in your name, your entire reputation is a rental that ends the day you stop paying.
What real reputation work looks like month to month
A reputation company that earns its fee is not doing one thing. It is running four connected jobs on a schedule, and knowing what those look like lets you tell a real operator from someone billing you for a widget.
- Review generation. Every customer gets an ask, sent at the moment the work is fresh, on the channel they actually check (usually a text). The system follows up on non-responders once, politely, then stops. Over a few months this is what closes the gap between you at 12 reviews and the competitor at 300, because you are finally asking everyone.
- Monitoring. Someone is watching Google, Facebook, Yelp, Angi, and the BBB daily, so a new review, good or bad, never sits for a week unseen. For contractors the platform that stings often is not Google, it is the trade directory where a dispute over a change order turns into a one-star, and if nobody is watching it festers.
- Response drafting. Every review gets a reply that sounds like a shop owner, not a call center. The five-stars get a real thank-you that mentions the job. The one-stars get a calm, specific, professional reply, because the response is not for the angry customer, it is for the next fifty homeowners reading it. A good shop drafts these and runs them past you before anything posts.
- Schema and display. Your star rating gets marked up in code so Google can pull it and so the AI answer engines have a clean number to cite. Your best reviews get displayed on your own site with the right markup, not a slow third-party badge.
Here is the test: ask a prospective shop to walk you through a normal month. If the answer is all four of those jobs, described in specifics, you are talking to an operator. If the answer is "we send review requests and give you a dashboard," you are being sold a tool, not a service, and you will end up doing the actual work yourself. The tool is the easy part. The discipline of running all four every month, for every customer, is the part you are actually paying a company to own.
Match the shop to your trade, not to a logo wall
Reviews do not behave the same across trades, and a company that has only ever managed reputation for restaurants or medspas will miss what matters for a contractor. The right shop can talk about your trade's review reality without you teaching it.
Take fencing, since it is one of the trickier ones. A fence job is high-ticket, visible from the street, and judged by neighbors who never hired you. The reviews that convert are the ones with photos of a finished line of cedar or a clean vinyl run, and the disputes that produce one-stars are almost always about property lines, permits, or a change order the homeowner did not expect. A reputation shop that knows fencing asks for the photo review specifically, times the ask for after the final walk when the customer is happiest, and drafts a one-star response that calmly references the signed scope instead of arguing. A generic shop asks for a plain-text review whenever and replies "sorry you feel that way," which reads as guilty to the next buyer.
The same specificity holds across the board. Roofers get hit on insurance-claim timing and cleanup. HVAC gets it on emergency-call pricing and the "cracked heat exchanger" trust gap. Plumbers get it on after-hours rates. A shop that works contractors knows which platform each trade gets ambushed on, when the happiest moment to ask is for that job type, and how to write a response that a future homeowner reads as fair. That fluency is not a nice-to-have. It is the difference between reviews that sound like your business and a feed that could belong to anyone.
So when you interview a reputation company, spend two minutes making them prove trade fluency. Ask what typically triggers a bad review in your trade, and when the best moment to ask for a review is on your kind of job. If they can answer without you feeding them the answer, they have done this in your lane. If they give you a generic marketing reply, they are about to run a dentist's template on your business and wonder why the reviews sound hollow.
Be honest about what can and cannot be removed
The fastest way to spot a company you should not hire is the removal promise. If a shop guarantees it can delete any bad review, it is either lying or planning to break a rule, and both end with you holding the bag.
Here is the honest version. You cannot get a review removed just because it is negative or because you disagree with it. You can request removal when a review actually violates the platform's policy: it is fake, it is from someone who was never a customer, it names another business by mistake, it contains profanity or a threat, or it is spam or a competitor's sabotage. A real reputation company knows the difference, files those disputes correctly, and follows up, but it also tells you plainly that a legitimate one-star from a real customer is almost never coming down. The play there is not deletion. It is a professional response plus enough new reviews that the one-star sinks and stops defining your rating.
That last point is the actual mechanic, and it is why removal is a distraction. One bad review inside a wall of recent five-stars barely moves your average and barely gets read. The same bad review sitting near the top of a thin profile defines you. So the durable fix for a reputation problem is almost never removing the bad, it is drowning it in real good: steady review generation that keeps your rating high and your recent reviews positive, so a single sour one is a footnote instead of the headline. A company selling you deletion is selling a one-time patch. A company building you review volume is fixing the thing that made one review matter so much in the first place.
Ask the removal question directly on the call: "a real customer left a fair one-star, can you get it taken down?" The honest answer is no, here is what we do instead. If the shop says yes, you have your answer about the whole company.
How our shop scores itself against this list
It would be a strange guide that told you to run a scorecard and then never ran the shop writing it through it. So here is the honest version, same checks, no gloss.
How reviews are earned: real asks to real customers, timed to the job, never gated and never bought, because gating draws penalties and fake reviews get purged. Account ownership: your Google Business Profile stays in your name, always, in writing. We do not rent you your own reputation. Platform coverage: we watch Google, Facebook, Yelp, Angi, and the BBB, because for a lot of trades the ambush lands off Google. Response drafting: replies that sound like a shop owner, run past you before they post. Trade fluency: since 2008 we have worked home-service contractors and only them, twenty trades, so we know when your kind of job produces a happy customer and where your kind of dispute turns into a one-star.
Bad-review handling: straight talk on what the platforms will and will not remove, and a drown-it-in-real-good plan for the rest. Schema markup: your rating marked up so Google reads it and the AI answer engines have a clean number to cite when a homeowner asks who is best. Reporting: tied to review count, star trend, and map-pack movement, not a vanity dashboard. Exit terms: you keep the profile, the reviews, and the system, because a reputation you own does not walk out with the vendor.
Now the honest limits, because a shop that says yes to everything is selling, not advising. We are the wrong call if you want fake reviews or a gating shortcut, we will not do either and will tell you why on the call. We are the wrong call if your real problem is map-pack ranking mechanics rather than reviews (reviews feed the map pack, but that is the Local SEO job next door), or if you want paid ads to make the phone ring this week. Run us through your own version of the scorecard. If we are the best fit for your problem, the checks will say so, and if we are not, they will say that too.